<<you mean all the other columns have value set to NULL and only SEQNUM is populated with values ?>>
Yes. All columns are NULL except SEQNUM. 6 rows with vales 1,2,3,4,5,6. I notice this is a new column which does not exist in 11.5 repositories.
<<was your repository upgrade successful ? >>
Yes. And it does not matter if I upgrade a repository with the DS3.1 unix (Solaris) repoman utility, or the windows version, the outcome feedback is “successful”
<<what is the database type of your repository ? you changed your DI repo schema to a different DB type of same db type ? >>
Repository database is Oracle 11g. Oracle client on both Solaris and Windows is 10.2.0.1.0. All database types specified as Oracle during upgrade)
<<How did you clone the DI 11.5 repo to different schema ? was everything ok after moving repo from one schema to other.>>
DBA copied 11.5 repository database with all associated repository schemas to a new database for upgrade testing. I personally examined the AL_MACHINE_INFO of one repository before upgrading to 3.1. The jobserver connections existed before, but not after.
<<did you resync each repo from the server manager for each job server? you have to resync to get rid of unwanted job server entries from AL_MACHINE_INFO table>>
No, because after the repository database was copied, no existing job servers had connections to the copy, so there was nothing to resync.
I will try removing the entries from AL_MACHINE_INFO from a 11.5 repository schema before upgrading it to 3.1, and then associate it with a 3.1 job server.
Thanks
Simon
simonkirk (BOB member since 2006-10-10)